The European Commission handed down one of its most consequential Digital Markets Act rulings yet on July 16, 2026, ordering Google to share anonymised search data with rival search engines and AI chatbots and to open up parts of Android so competing AI assistants can be activated as easily as Google’s own tools. The order targets two of the choke points regulators say have let Google entrench its dominance into the AI era: control over the search index that trains and grounds AI answers, and control over the Android operating system that decides which assistant a phone listens to.
What Google Must Actually Do
Under the Commission’s order, Google must give rival AI assistants materially wider access to Android’s functions — including allowing users to trigger a third-party AI assistant with a voice command in the same frictionless way they currently say “Hey Google.” Separately, Google must begin sharing anonymised search data with eligible competing search engines and AI chatbot makers, giving them access to the kind of real-time web signal that Google has used to make its own AI Overviews and Gemini responses more accurate and current than rivals that lack an equivalent index.
The Timeline
The two obligations arrive on different clocks. Search-data sharing with eligible competitors is required to begin in January 2027. The Android changes — allowing rival AI assistants deeper system-level access — are expected to reach users starting in July 2027, giving Google roughly a year to rebuild the relevant parts of Android’s assistant architecture without, in its telling, compromising the platform’s security model.
The Financial Stakes
Non-compliance is not a minor risk. The Commission has signaled fines of up to 10% of Alphabet’s global annual revenue for failure to comply — a penalty that, at Alphabet’s current revenue scale, could exceed $30 billion, among the largest potential single-case antitrust exposures any technology company has faced under EU law. That figure alone is likely to shape how aggressively Google contests or slow-walks implementation.
Google’s Objection
Google has pushed back hard. Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker publicly warned that the mandated changes “risk undermining privacy and security safeguards” that Android and Google Search have built over years, arguing that forcing search-data sharing and third-party assistant access could open the door to abuse by less scrupulous competitors who don’t meet Google’s own data-handling standards. Google has previously used similar arguments in disputes over DMA-mandated interoperability, and EU officials have generally responded that security concerns can be addressed through technical safeguards rather than blanket refusal to comply.
Why Regulators Are Targeting the AI Layer Specifically
The order reflects a broader pivot in how EU antitrust enforcers think about Big Tech: rather than treating search and mobile operating systems as separate battlegrounds from the AI assistant race, the Commission is treating them as the same fight. Search data and default-assistant status are exactly the assets that let an incumbent’s AI products improve faster than challengers’, even if the underlying AI models are comparably capable — a dynamic regulators say entrenches dominance in a new market before it even fully forms, rather than after the fact the way earlier antitrust cases against Google Search and Android played out over the 2010s.
What’s Next
Google is expected to appeal aspects of the order to the EU’s General Court, a process that historically takes years and rarely results in the underlying obligations being suspended in the meantime. Rival AI assistant makers — from smaller EU-based startups to larger US players positioning for European distribution — will be watching closely to see whether the January 2027 search-data-sharing deadline holds, since it would mark one of the first times a non-Google company gets structured access to search-quality data at meaningful scale. The case is also likely to become a reference point in ongoing US antitrust proceedings against Google, where courts and regulators have separately weighed remedies covering search distribution and default-assistant placement; a working European model for data-sharing and Android access could shape the remedies American regulators eventually settle on, even though the two legal systems operate independently. Smaller AI assistant makers in Europe, who have long argued they cannot compete with Google’s access to real-time search signal, are expected to lobby hard to make sure the January 2027 data-sharing deadline is not itself pushed back the way several EU AI Act deadlines already have been this year.
Photo: ozbornea / BY via flickr